In
regards to this series, the entire design image is impressed into a
working die from a working hub, with the exception of the date.
The dates were individually impressed into each working die
with
the exception of 1909. As a result, there will be variances
in
the placement of the date and the above section of die varieties will
help in desribing an individual dies. So, we may use this
fact to help us attribute, or identify individual dies. By
utilizing
a simple geometric concept, we can measure date placement by
construcintg a line from the left edge of the serif of the 1 and the
left edge of the base of that 1 and extending it into the denticles
below. Where the line intersects in relation to a denticle is
the
date measurement and can be described as B(between denticles), LE(left
edge of denticle),LH(left half of denticle), C(center of denticle),
RH(right half of denticle) and RE(right edge of denticle).
Since
two points define a line, the serif and base of the 1 satisfy that law
and we have an accurate attribute for that particular die. An
illustration of this can be found here:
date
placement .
Reverse
die identification is not as precise, since the entire image ws
impresed into a working die and there was nothing individually added,
as was the case with the date on obverse working dies. In
this
case, if the image was sunk deep into the working die, then elements
close to the rim would touch or nearly do so. These elements
are
the shield points and the first olive leaf. If the image was
not
sunk too deeply, then these images would be farther away from the rim.
I rarely use this as an additional identifier for an obvere
or
reverse die variety, unless an obverse die variety is paired with two
different reverses with no other die markers such as die cracks to
differentiate the two. Nevertheless, an illustration of this
process can be found here:
Reverse
Identification
Sometimes
working dies will incur damge such as scratches, gouges, chips and etc.
that also help in identifying particular dies. Any type of
mark
on a working die will be transferred to a coin and will be in relief.
However, the absence of these identifiers leave us with only
date
placement and reverse hubbing depth to describe a particular die.
When I describe a die variety in this book, I will mention
date
placement and any other die marker present under the comment section of
each variety. In addition, a close-up of the date and
macrophotography of the stated die variety.
So-Called Longacre Doubling
The
term Longacre doubling is actually a misnomer for the the extra
outlines seen on many indian cents. Many new collectors will
incorrectly identify these outlines as a doubled die, so I will try to
shed some light on the subject.
These outlines are actually an artifact from the
master die and are transferred to the working hubs and finally working
dies The degree at which these outlines on coins are seen is
directly proportional to the hubbing depth that was imparted on the
working hubs and working dies Therefore, if hubbing depth was
great, then outlines would be seen on the coins. Conversely,
if
hubbing depth was lesser, then the presence of these outlines would be
lessened or absent.
During 1886, Charles Barber designed a new obverse master hub
from his galvano. The galvano now included the legend, which
was
added to the master die prior to this change. The master hub
was
then used to make a master die. The manufacture of
this
obverse master die is exactly where the extra outlines were eliminated.
In his article entitled "Extra Outlines", Rick Snow indicates
the
following: "Apparently, Longacre did not want any field areas
to
effect the working hubs he was going to make, so he removed the metal
from the field areas on the master die, being careful not to get too
close to the letters and devices. By doing this extra step,
he
created extra outlines." Charles Barber's master die does not
include this step, thus the outlines ended when longacre's master die
disconttinued hubbing working dies. The reverse hub longacre
designed was never changed by Barber, so extra outlines remain on the
reverses of many indian cents until the end of the series.
Die Numbering
The
numbering system I use for this online reference is the same method
that Jerry Fortin employs in his 'Definitive Resource for Liberty
Seated Dime Variety Collectors". I think it is a logical
approach
to the study of die pairs.
Die
marriages for a particular date are dentoed by a number, starting with
1 and continuing with 2, 3, 4, and etc. for each consecutive die pair.
Die states for each variety will be denoted by a lower case
letter next to the die marriage number. For instance 1a, 1b
and
1c all denote the same die pair, but each describe a different die
state. Die states are usually noted for die crack formations,
cuds, clashes, and die polishing. Where applicable,
a table
will be available at the die variety page for a given date and will
denote the die marriage number, as well as die stage letter.
In
addition, a photograph of the obverse and reverse of the coin in each
die state will be included in the table. The die stage table
is
an important tool for conveying die state progression, whereas
describing die states with just words seems inefficient
Obverse
die for a particular die pair is denoted with numbers,
starting
with 1 and coninuing onward for each observed die pair. Die
states for each obverse are listed as 1.2, 1.3 and etc.
Reverse
die for a particular die pair is denoted with a capital letter,
starting with A and continuing onward alphabetically for each observed
die pair. Die states for each reverse are listed as A.2, A.3
and
etc.
Scarcity Estimates
The
universal rarity scale, which was first creatd by Q. David Bowers, will
be utilized within this web book to estimate the total surviving
examples of a given date, die pair, or die state. Estimates are
based on my 15 years experience wihin the indian cent series, as well
as observations through auctions, publications and coin shows that I am
able to attend. Rarity estimates will be as accurate as possible
and will be revised downward when more examples of a given die paring
are located than initially estimated and upward when evidence supports
a scacer estimate. Of course, the tendency of estimate revisions
are downward with the introduction of more examples of a given die
pairing due to publication of this web book, longacre ledger and the
fly-inclub.
I have included the universal rarity scale
below. The third column was added by me to give an explanation,
or example, of what the exact URS rating indicates in regards to the
indian cent series. Survival estimates for common date, tough
date, etc. are derived from 'A Guide Book of Flying Eagle and Indian Head Cents' by Rick Snow.